Presence and movement
- presence in a publicly accessible place
- open movement
- visits to an organization or site
- sequence of events
Обновлено
FACTUAL DOCUMENTATION / EVIDENCE LOGBLACKFILE helps establish and document factual circumstances: presence at a particular location, meetings, routes, use of a premises, business activity and sequence of events.
Work is carried out only where there is a lawful purpose, taking into account the rules of the specific country and privacy requirements. Each item receives a date, context, source and description of limitations.
At the first stage, do not submit sensitive materials. It is enough to describe the circumstance that needs to be established, the country and the purpose of the matter.
In a dispute, each party presents its own version of events. Until a circumstance is established and recorded with a date, context and a clear origin, it remains a statement that is difficult to rely on in negotiations or proceedings.
Documentation does not replace a legal assessment. It provides the legal team with material that can be verified: what exactly was observed, when, in what context, by what means it was established, and where the limits of the work lie.
We record what can be lawfully established, and state directly what could not be established.

It is necessary to establish a party's actual activity, the use of a property, or the sequence of significant events.
The legal team needs more than statements - it needs structured material with a date, context, and clear origin.
It is necessary to establish whether actual conduct corresponds to the agreed terms.
It is necessary to verify the use of real estate, vehicles, equipment, or another object.
It is necessary to establish the circumstances of an incident without unlawful interference in employees' private lives.
It is necessary to verify facts relevant to the assessment of claims and the parties' positions.
Documentation is applied after the subject has been lawfully identified, and only within permissible limits.
The scope of work is determined by the task and the rules of the specific country. We state in advance what can be lawfully established and what cannot be established under any circumstances.

Each episode is given a date, context, source and description of its limitations
Red marks a material confirmed discrepancy with the original information
The materials are structured so that a legal team can work with them without further transcription.
A list of episodes with date, time interval, location context and description of the observed fact.
A sequence of events indicating which were independently confirmed and which remained isolated.
Photo or video materials, if obtained lawfully, with a description of their origin and the conditions under which they were obtained.
Structure of observed contacts without publishing sensitive data about participants.
Division of statements into established, partially confirmed and unconfirmed, with contradictions noted.
Description of the methods used, the legal limitations of the country and what was not documented as a matter of principle.
The admissibility of the materials is determined by applicable law and the client's legal advisers. BLACKFILE does not guarantee that the materials will be accepted by a court or other authority.
When a position is built on circumstances that need to be established and put on record before proceedings.
When a counterparty states one thing, while the actual activity or use of the object appears different.
When it is necessary to verify the actual use of real estate, vehicles or equipment.
When the assessment of a claim depends on circumstances that no one has recorded.
When it is necessary to establish the circumstances of an incident without intruding on employees' private lives.
When, after a debtor has been located, it is necessary to confirm their actual position.

Задача. Legitimate purpose - protection of a proprietary interest in a dispute. Fact under verification: a party's statement that the property is not in use. Method: observation from adjacent publicly accessible territory during an agreed period.
Результат. Signs of regular use of the property were recorded during morning and evening hours over four days. Materials were provided to the legal team with dates and a description of context. Limitations: interior premises were not documented, the condition of the property inside was not verified.
Задача. Legitimate purpose - preparation of a position in a corporate dispute. Fact under verification: the existence of business contacts between the parties that had been denied. Method: documenting meetings in publicly accessible locations.
Результат. Two meetings in public spaces were confirmed, with dates and intervals recorded. The content of the conversations was not established or recorded. Materials were prepared as an event log. Limitations: the connection between the meetings and the subject of the dispute remains a matter for legal assessment.
Задача. Legitimate purpose - counterparty verification prior to legal action. Fact under verification: a statement that no activity takes place at the registered address. Method: observation in a publicly accessible area and comparison with open sources.
Результат. Publicly observable activity at the address during working hours was established over four days, which was inconsistent with the party's statement. Limitations: staff composition and the nature of the work were not established.
Задача. Legitimate purpose - assessment of contract performance. Fact under verification: whether actual conduct matched agreed delivery terms. Method: recording openly observable circumstances at agreed locations.
Результат. Part of the obligations was confirmed documentarily; confirmation could not be obtained for one episode - this is stated directly in the report. Limitations: absence of confirmation does not mean the event did not occur.
The scenarios presented are composite examples based on typical tasks. They are not descriptions of specific completed projects. BLACKFILE does not document circumstances inside private premises and does not use technical interception devices.
The client describes the circumstance that needs to be established and the purpose of the task.
We assess the legitimate purpose, conflicts of interest and the admissibility of the task itself.
We formulate specific verifiable statements, not a general wish.
We take into account the rules of the specific jurisdiction and privacy limitations.
We record the methods, timeframe, locations, and what will not be documented.
We establish the circumstances within permissible limits, recording the date and context.
We check dates, materials and sequence, and look for independent confirmation.
We form a structured log separating facts, conclusions and assumptions.
We deliver the result through a secure channel with a description of the methodology and limitations.
Choose the engagement format based on the number of circumstances, locations and countries.
From €3,000
Timeframe determined by the task
Cost depends on the country, duration, number of specialists, locations and requirements for the presentation of materials. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Verification of one specific statement with dates and context recorded.
From €6,000 to €18,000
Timeframe determined by the task
Cost depends on the country, duration, number of specialists, locations and requirements for the presentation of materials. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Work on several statements with a documentary timeline and verification of contradictions.
On request
Timeframe is determined after assessment
The cost is determined after assessment of the matter and depends on the countries involved, duration, and formatting requirements. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Work across several jurisdictions with multiple subjects and a complex legal matter.
BLACKFILE does not accept matters involving harassment, intimidation, domestic violence, political pressure, invasion of privacy, or circumvention of court restrictions.
Prohibited and not performed: entry into private premises, unlawful audio recording, interception of communications, installation of devices, obtaining private geolocation, use of unlawful databases, provocation, and stalking of a person.
Circumstances observed in publicly accessible places: presence, open movement, visits to an organization, publicly observable business activity, use of a property and its actual condition. Anything requiring entry into private space, interception, or technical devices falls outside our work.
Yes, but rules differ substantially: what is permissible in one jurisdiction is prohibited in another. Before starting work, we assess the requirements of the specific country and state directly if a task cannot be carried out there by lawful means.
Procedural admissibility is determined by applicable law and the client's legal counsel. We prepare materials so they can be worked with conveniently: date, time interval, location context, description of origin and limitations. No one can guarantee that materials will be accepted by a court, and we do not promise this.
We do not install devices, do not record in private spaces, and do not use covert technical means. Photo and video materials are possible only where permitted by the law of the specific country, and always with a description of the conditions of acquisition.
By three criteria: legality in the specific jurisdiction, proportionality to the task, and absence of interference with private life. If a method fails even one criterion, it is not applied, even if technically possible.
Yes, this is one of the common tasks: signs of regular use, the actual condition of the property, and circumstances observable from publicly accessible territory are recorded. Interior premises are not documented.
It is entered into the report as unconfirmed, with an indication of the period and conditions of work. We always add a caveat: the absence of confirmation does not mean the event did not occur. We will not present the absence of a result as proof of the opposite.
Each episode is given a code, date, time interval, location context, description of the observed fact, source, degree of confirmation, and limitations. Established fact, analytical conclusion, assumption, and third-party information are separated distinctly.
Factual Verification - from €3,000, Extended Documentation - from €6,000 to €18,000, international tasks - on request. The cost depends on the country, duration, number of specialists and locations, and third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Materials are transmitted through a secure channel, with access limited to the client and persons named by the client. Where necessary, a chain of custody is maintained so the origin of each material can be traced.
Only the client and its legal team, if named by the client. We do not pass materials to third parties and do not disclose the fact of the engagement.
At the first stage, do not send sensitive materials. It is sufficient to describe the task, the country and the required outcome.