Обновлено
01 / OPEN-SOURCE INTELLIGENCEBLACKFILE finds, cross-references and verifies information from lawfully accessible sources to reconstruct a person's or a company's history, connections, corporate context and risk factors.
The result is not an array of links, but a structured picture with dates, sources, confidence levels and questions that require a next step.
Identification · Archives · Connections · Reputation · Verification
Identical names, outdated profiles, reprints, removed context and incorrect automated links create a false picture. BLACKFILE's OSINT work starts with identification and ends with verifying the origin of every material conclusion.
relevant sources and archived versions
exclude namesakes and false matches
link events, roles, companies and dates
determine source quality and the limit of confidence
Check the person's history, companies and public conflicts.
| Official register | Court source | Corporate disclosure | Archive | Media | Own publication | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | ||||||
| Role | ||||||
| Company | ||||||
| Connection | ||||||
| Event | ||||||
| Reputational factor |
Source and date: State register; extract as of the report date.
Relates to the subject: Match by full name, date of birth and jurisdiction.
Independent confirmation: Confirmed by corporate disclosure.
Limit of the conclusion: The register reflects the status as of the extract date.
Red marks only a material confirmed contradiction. A "percentage of truth" without a methodology is not shown: every entry has a source, a date and a limit of confidence.
BLACKFILE does not obtain private correspondence, passwords, private accounts, device data or information obtained by circumventing technical protection.
identification matches in open sources
stated biography, education and professional roles
companies, directorships and beneficial ownership connections according to available registers
litigation and regulatory context
open sanctions and PEP overlaps
public business connections and joint projects
media history and origin of statements
domains, websites and public digital infrastructure
archived versions of pages and publications
material contradictions between dates, roles and statements
Первичный источник предпочтительнее пересказа.
Official register · confirmed · Basis for further conclusions
Own publication · contradiction · Question for the other party before signing
Archive + media · probable · Current status requires verification
Court source · excluded · Namesake: risk cleared
Who am I actually about to deal with?
ResultA verified picture of a person or company before a decision.
The examples are composite and do not describe a specific client.
An automated search linked a candidate for a senior role to a litigation episode. Comparison of dates, geography and corporate records showed that the record belonged to a namesake.
ResultThe false risk is excluded, and the method of identification is documented.
Public profiles of the partner showed differing role dates and history of company involvement.
ResultArchival and official sources restored the timeline and formed questions before the agreement was signed.
Illustrative image. The scenario is composite.
The subject, the decision, the countries and the permissible scope.
from €2,000
usually 24-48 hours
Identification and a basic open picture of a person or company.
3 500-7 500 €
typically 3-7 business days
In-depth verification with archives and an evidence convergence matrix.
individual estimate
staged verification with a protected briefing
International verification coordinated with related teams.
The cost depends on the number of subjects, countries, languages and the quality of the source identifiers. The presence of information in open sources is not guaranteed.
BLACKFILE assesses the admissibility of a task, minimizes the volume of data collected, and does not gather information out of curiosity or for pressure. The fact that a record is public does not mean it can be used without regard to applicable law and context.
No. A professional check includes identification, archival research, cross-referencing of sources, elimination of false matches and assessment of evidentiary weight.
No. BLACKFILE uses lawfully accessible sources and does not bypass technical protection.
In some cases information is preserved in lawful web archives, official records or independent publications. Availability of a specific item is not guaranteed.
Only for a lawful purpose and where sufficient open indicators exist. An assumption of authorship is not presented as an established fact.
Yes, if lawful sources are available and the task is permissible. The depth depends on the country and the quality of the source data.
OSINT is a method of collecting and verifying open data. Background Check is a broader service combining several verification areas around a specific decision.
Do not send passports, passwords, private correspondence or sensitive documents. General identifiers are sufficient at the first stage.
