Identification
- identity
- name variants
- documents - to the extent legally accessible
- address and professional consistency
- distinction from persons of the same name
Обновлено
ENVIRONMENT CHECK / ACCESS REVIEWBLACKFILE checks people who gain regular access to the person, family, home, information, assets or corporate processes
We establish identity, biographical and professional information, conflicts of interest, corporate connections, litigation and reputational circumstances, financial indicators and dependencies capable of affecting the reliability of the person
At the first stage it is sufficient to state the person's role and the level of access to be granted. Documents and personal data are provided later, through an agreed channel
Personal and corporate staff know schedules, routes, contacts, habits, family circumstances and internal processes. Certain employees have access to documents, finances, communications and decisions.
Risk is not determined by a person's profession or background. It arises from a combination of the level of access, circumstances identified, conflicts of interest and unverified dependencies.
Verification must be proportionate to the actual level of access and conducted in compliance with the law.

Assistants, drivers, security, secretaries and aides: permanent access to schedules, routes and contacts
House managers, nannies, tutors, service staff and regular contractors
Advisers, asset managers, accountants, lawyers, intermediaries and consultants
Key employees, IT staff, department heads, procurement staff and employees with financial authority
Companies and specialists granted periodic access to a site or to internal processes
When a person is already employed but gains access to finances, documents or higher-level decisions
The scope of verification is determined by the role and the level of access. Financial complexity or debt alone are not considered grounds for a conclusion of unreliability

The same circumstance carries a different weight depending on the level of access
ПОВТОРНАЯ ОЦЕНКА Reassessment every 12 months
Marked in red is a material combination of high access and a confirmed risk. The assessment does not replace a personnel decision
A driver with access to daily routes is assessed differently from a contractor who visits the site once. No automatic rating of a person is used: the conclusion is always explained by facts.
The report separates confirmed circumstances, discrepancies and matters requiring discussion, and always states the limits of the check.
Identity, employment history and stated roles, with sources of confirmation indicated.
Corporate connections, parallel activities and overlaps with the client's counterparties.
Available litigation history, professional restrictions and significant publications.
What the person discloses publicly about the employer, properties, routes and schedules.
How the circumstances found relate to the level of access intended to be granted.
Recommendations for limiting and controlling access, a list of discrepancies, and what could not be verified.
BLACKFILE does not make personnel decisions on the client's behalf. The report provides verified information and context, and the decision remains with the client and its legal or HR advisers.
When staff and contractors gain access to the home, children, schedule and private life.
When a personal assistant, driver or adviser knows more than any employee of the company.
When a key employee is granted financial authority or access to counterparties.
When an independent source of facts is needed for decisions on admission and control.
When a decision about a person must rely on verifiable information and comply with legal requirements.
When access to processes is granted to a person who affects the value and stability of an asset.

Задача. Role: personal assistant to an executive. Anticipated access: schedule, correspondence, internal documents. Task - to confirm the background before expanding authority.
Результат. Education and the two most recent positions were confirmed. A discrepancy was found: a claimed managerial role at one of the companies turned out to be a consulting role. A phased expansion of access and confirmation of authority through a second channel were recommended. Limitation: the reasons for leaving one position could not be established through lawful means.
Задача. Role: Family Office asset manager. Anticipated access: finances, documents, transaction decisions. Task - to verify connections and obligations before transferring authority.
Результат. Active corporate roles at two companies were established, one of which overlapped with a counterparty of the family - a conflict of interest was recorded. No litigation circumstances were identified. Disclosure of connections and dual control over transactions were recommended. Limitation: information in one jurisdiction is subject to disclosure restrictions.
Задача. Role: driver and external contractors. Anticipated access: routes, the property, periodic presence. Task - to assess cumulative access and digital exposure.
Результат. The driver's professional history was confirmed, though publications were found disclosing the place of work and locations. The contractor was found to have changed the composition of subcontractors without notice. Publication rules and an access procedure were introduced. Limitation: verification of subcontractors is possible only through open sources.
Задача. Role: employee with procurement authority. Anticipated access: counterparties, terms, payments. Task - to check for signs of parallel activity.
Результат. Participation was confirmed in a company connected to a supplier that had not been disclosed. The information was passed to the client's legal and HR teams. BLACKFILE did not make any personnel decision. Limitation: the assessment is based on open corporate sources.
The scenarios presented are composite examples based on typical tasks. They are not descriptions of specific completed projects. BLACKFILE does not conduct discriminatory assessments and does not make personnel decisions.
The client specifies the person's role and the level of access intended to be granted.
We assess the basis for the check and the requirements of applicable labor law.
We determine the actual level of access: to people, premises, documents, finances, and decisions.
We agree on the composition of the check and the necessary consents, where required.
We confirm identity and separate individuals with the same name.
We check background, connections, litigation, and reputational context.
We assess the significance of the findings specifically for this role.
We prepare materials with sources, discrepancies, and recommendations on access control.
We discuss the result with the client and their advisors.
Choose a format based on the person's level of access and the number of individuals to be checked.
From € 2,000
Usually 4-7 business days
The final cost depends on the number of people, countries, depth of check, and requirements of applicable law.
Basic verification of identity, professional history and key circumstances.
From € 4,000 to € 9,000
Typically 7-15 business days
The final cost depends on the number of people, countries, depth of check, and requirements of applicable law.
In-depth verification covering several countries, financial indicators, digital exposure and an access matrix.
On request
Timeframe determined after discussion
The cost is determined after discussion and depends on the number of people, countries and frequency of repeat checks.
A single verification standard for the entire environment, with role classification and periodic reassessment.
The work takes into account requirements relating to personal data, employment relationships and necessary consents. The scope of the check must be proportionate to the level of access, not collected as a reserve.
BLACKFILE does not conduct assessments that discriminate on the basis of origin, nationality, religion, health, marital status or other protected characteristics, and does not use unlawfully obtained personal, banking or medical information.
People who receive regular or substantial access to you, your family, home, information, assets or company processes: assistants, drivers, security personnel, household staff, advisers, asset managers, key employees and contractors. The basis for the check must be lawful, and the scope proportionate to the level of access.
This depends on the jurisdiction, the nature of the relationship and the scope of the check. In employment relationships consent is often required, and we discuss this before work begins. Checks based on open sources and corporate registers can be conducted in a broader scope, but requirements for personal data are observed in all cases.
A Background Check answers the question of who a person is. A surrounding-circle check adds a second dimension - the level of access: the same circumstance carries different weight for a contractor who visits once a year and for an asset manager. The result is assessed against the specific role the person holds in relation to you.
Yes, and this is a common task, since household staff gain access to routines, premises and the family. The check is conducted properly and without intrusion into private life: identity, professional history and available court records are established, not details of the person's personal life.
Yes, where this is permissible and agreed. We confirm the fact of employment and the stated role through available sources. The reasons for the end of a previous relationship are established only where the information is available through lawful means - we will not speculate about them.
Open-source information is checked: bankruptcies, collections, unresolved obligations and indicators that could create a conflict of interest. The mere fact of debt or financial difficulty is not treated as grounds for a conclusion of unreliability, and we state this explicitly in the report.
Yes, there is a programme format for this: roles are classified by level of access, a corresponding verification standard is set for each level, and the results are presented in a unified format. This is more efficient and less costly than checking people individually without a common structure.
For roles with high access - approximately once a year, for contractors - before each major contract, for household staff - once every eighteen months. An unscheduled check is appropriate in the event of expanded authority, conflict or signs of a leak.
The person's role, country and the intended level of access are sufficient. Personal data and documents are requested later, once the scope, grounds and a secure transmission channel have been agreed.
Only the client and the persons they designate: legal counsel, HR or the head of security. We do not disclose materials to third parties and do not inform the person being checked of the fact of the check, unless this is provided for by the agreed procedure.
The volume of data is limited to what is necessary for the specific task, sensitive information is not collected without grounds, and storage and transfer follow an agreed procedure. If a task requires a person's consent or notification, we discuss this before work begins.
At the first stage, general information is sufficient. Do not attach copies of documents or personal data - these are requested after the grounds and a secure channel have been agreed.