Individual
Identification, documents, activity, companies, PEP, sanctions, adverse media and source of funds
Due Diligence of an individualОбновлено
COMPREHENSIVE DUE DILIGENCEBLACKFILE conducts comprehensive Due Diligence of individuals and legal entities: it verifies identification documents, biographical and corporate information, beneficial owners, sanctions and reputational factors, source of funds and the circumstances of the specific transaction.
We do not limit ourselves to a single database or a formal extract. Information is cross-checked, material discrepancies are verified further, and each conclusion is given a source, a degree of confirmation and a description of its limitations.
For an initial assessment, it is enough to state the subject, the countries, the purpose of the check and the expected timeframe for the decision.
The client enters onboarding, and the decision is made on the basis of the information provided
A person may confirm a name but not explain the origin of funds. A company may exist in the register but not disclose its actual beneficial owner. An investment project may have a compelling presentation but depend on unconfirmed partnerships and rights to the asset.
Due Diligence establishes whether the documents, background, companies, assets, source of funds and purpose of the relationship are consistent with one another
What is examined is not a single document but the consistency of the entire stated account
Identification, documents, activity, companies, PEP, sanctions, adverse media and source of funds
Due Diligence of an individualRegistration, activity, owners, beneficial owners, management, litigation and reputational circumstances
Company Due DiligenceParties, authority, subject matter, obligations, encumbrances and the actual ability to perform
Transaction Due DiligenceTeam, owners, assets, financial premises, partners and jurisdictions
Investment project checkProfessional, corporate and property basis of the declared capital.
Consistency of the details, the information contained and independent sources.
The absence of negative information is not equivalent to the absence of risk.
Confirmation that all information relates to a single person, and internal consistency of the documents provided.
Identity is confirmed or indicators requiring clarification are noted.
LimitationsThe official validity of a document is confirmed by an authorised source, not by analytical verification.

Trust does not replace verification. Verification defines the limits of reasonable trust.
Verified identity · Ownership clarity · Source consistency · Decision supportExample report structure. Not a description of any specific client.

Onboarding a client with an international structure and capital whose origin requires explanation.
Проверяемые контурыRecommended formatEnhanced Due Diligence
The task - to decide whether to enter into a relationship with a private investor. Initial information: questionnaire, documents, two countries, a declared source of wealth.
Проверенные контуры: Identity, Documents, Ownership, Sanctions & PEP, Source of Funds.
Подтверждено. Identity, corporate roles and part of the basis of wealth were confirmed.
Расхождение. Discrepancy: the scale of the declared capital was not fully explained by the established activity.
Результат для решения. The client received a list of documents needed to resolve the discrepancy and could decide on the terms of the relationship.
Banking information was not requested, and part of the period remained without documentary confirmation.
The task - to understand who actually controls the counterparty. Initial information: a company in a jurisdiction with limited disclosure.
Scopes checked: Ownership, Companies, Courts, Reputation.
Подтверждено. Three links of the ownership chain and a match of representatives between the companies were confirmed.
Расхождение. Discrepancy: the declared sole owner did not match the indicators of actual control.
Результат для решения. The legal team received an ownership chart distinguishing confirmed links from presumed ones.
The ultimate beneficial owner in one jurisdiction was not established - disclosure is limited by law.
The task - to verify the declared source of funds before a major transaction. Initial information: a business sale agreement and the party's explanations.
Verified scope: Source of Funds, Companies, Courts, Documents.
Подтверждено. The sale of the company is confirmed by corporate sources.
Расхождение. Discrepancy: the amount and date of settlement did not correspond with the stated chronology.
Результат для решения. The decision was deferred pending settlement documents; the party provided the documents in part.
Confirmation of payments is possible only through client documents; banking data is not requested.
The task is to verify both parties to a prospective long-term contract. Initial information: two companies, three jurisdictions.
Проверенные контуры: Identity, Companies, Ownership, Sanctions & PEP, Courts.
Подтверждено. Registration, management and the absence of direct sanctions matches were confirmed.
Расхождение. Discrepancy: one party was found to have outstanding court obligations not disclosed during negotiations.
Результат для решения. The terms of the contract were revised in light of the circumstances identified.
The assessment reflects the position as of the date of verification and requires updating before signing.
The client identifies the subject of the check and the decision to be made.
We assess the lawfulness of the task, conflicts of interest and applicable requirements.
We determine what exactly is being checked and for what decision.
We agree the level of verification: basic, extended or comprehensive.
We define the set of sources and the list of documents required from the client.
We collect information and compare what is stated with what is confirmed.
Each material discrepancy is checked separately.
We produce the final risk profile and a list of open questions.
We review the conclusions, limitations and any further documents required.
Выберите уровень по цене решения, числу объектов и юрисдикций.
From €2,500
Usually 4-7 business days
The final cost depends on the number of subjects, countries, depth of verification and availability of sources. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Basic verification of one person or company across core areas.
€6,000 to €15,000
Usually 10-20 business days
The final cost depends on the number of subjects, countries, depth of verification and availability of sources. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.
Extended verification of an individual and related companies in several countries with analysis of the origin of funds.
On request
Timeframe is determined after assessment
The fee is determined after assessment and depends on the number of subjects, jurisdictions and the complexity of the structure. Third-party costs are agreed in advance.
Comprehensive work covering several individuals and organizations, PEP context and Source of Wealth.
BLACKFILE verifies the information contained in the document, available indicators of inconsistency and consistency with independent sources. Official confirmation of validity depends on the availability of an authorized source or a specialized provider.
A Background Check answers the question of who a person is: biography, roles, obligations. Due Diligence is broader and is always tied to a specific decision: in addition to the person, it examines documents, companies, beneficial owners, the origin of funds and the circumstances of the transaction, and the result is presented as a risk profile for that decision. In simple terms, a Background Check is one scope of work within Due Diligence.
Yes, this is one of the main areas of work. We check identity and documents, biography and activity, companies and roles, PEP and sanctions indicators, litigation circumstances, reputational context and the origin of funds. The depth depends on the decision: onboarding a client, an appointment, a partnership or an investment each require a different scope.
We verify the information contained in the document: internal consistency of the details, available indicators of inconsistency and correspondence with independent sources and the questionnaire. Official confirmation of a document's validity is given by an authorized source or a specialized provider - we will not present an analytical check as a government one.
An advanced level applied when the cost of error is high or a basic check has raised questions. It covers related companies, ownership structure and beneficial owners, multiple countries, PEP and sanctions, adverse media, source of funds analysis and mandatory verification of any discrepancies found. The result is a detailed report with a risk map, not a certificate.
Yes, the check is run against official sanctions and restrictive lists, as well as the public office-holding status of the subject and related persons. An important nuance: a name match by itself means nothing - until identity is confirmed, it remains a technical match, and we state this directly.
Source of Funds is the origin of the specific funds involved in a transaction or relationship: the sale of an asset, income from an activity, dividends. Source of Wealth is the overall property and professional basis of a person's wealth as a whole. The first answers the question of where this money came from, the second - where this capital came from in general. For major decisions, both are usually required.
Yes, and this is often where the result lies: a structure that looks simple in one jurisdiction may have related companies in others. Each country has its own registers, scope of disclosure and cost of access, and the number of jurisdictions directly affects timing and price.
Through the ownership chain: from the company to its participants, from participants to their owners, down to natural persons. Where beneficial ownership registers are closed, indirect indicators are used - representatives, addresses, counterparties, history of roles. Such conclusions are labeled as analytical, not as established fact, and this distinction is maintained in the report.
A discrepancy is not a verdict. We verify it against a second independent source, determine what document or explanation could resolve it, and set it out in a separate section of the report with an assessment of materiality. Some discrepancies are explained by circumstances: a change in name spelling, differences in legislation, outdated register data.
For an initial assessment - none: it is enough to describe the subject, the countries and the decision at hand. Beyond that, the set of documents depends on the task: identification documents, corporate papers, contracts or proof of source of funds. Documents are requested only after the scope and a secure transmission channel have been agreed.
Initial - usually 4-7 business days, Enhanced - 10-20 business days. The comprehensive international format depends on the number of subjects and jurisdictions, and the timeline is determined after assessment. The countdown begins after the scope is agreed and the initial data is received, not from the moment of first contact.
Only the client and persons named by the client: compliance, legal team, board of directors. Materials are not passed to third parties, the subject of the check is not notified of it, and transmission takes place over an agreed secure channel.
Describe the subject and the forthcoming decision. BLACKFILE will assess the admissibility of the task, the required depth and a secure format of engagement.
At this stage, general information is sufficient. Documents are not uploaded before a secure channel is agreed.