Обновлено

COMPREHENSIVE DUE DILIGENCE

Before entering into a relationship, it is important to understand who you are actually dealing with

BLACKFILE conducts comprehensive Due Diligence of individuals and legal entities: it verifies identification documents, biographical and corporate information, beneficial owners, sanctions and reputational factors, source of funds and the circumstances of the specific transaction.

We do not limit ourselves to a single database or a formal extract. Information is cross-checked, material discrepancies are verified further, and each conclusion is given a source, a degree of confirmation and a description of its limitations.

For an initial assessment, it is enough to state the subject, the countries, the purpose of the check and the expected timeframe for the decision.

The client enters onboarding, and the decision is made on the basis of the information provided

What is claimed
Name, nationality and country of residence per the questionnaire
What has been confirmed
Identity confirmed by several independent indicators
Discrepancy found
The spelling of the name differs between two documents
Document required
Document explaining the discrepancy in spelling
Impact on the decision
Without resolving the discrepancy, further conclusions remain conditional
INDIVIDUALSDOCUMENTSCOMPANIESBENEFICIAL OWNERSSOURCE OF FUNDSTRANSACTIONSINTERNATIONAL RISK
02 / RISK OF INCONSISTENCY

Documents may be valid while the overall picture is incomplete

A person may confirm a name but not explain the origin of funds. A company may exist in the register but not disclose its actual beneficial owner. An investment project may have a compelling presentation but depend on unconfirmed partnerships and rights to the asset.

Due Diligence establishes whether the documents, background, companies, assets, source of funds and purpose of the relationship are consistent with one another

What is examined is not a single document but the consistency of the entire stated account

03 / SUBJECT OF VERIFICATION

One methodology - different subjects and depth of verification

02

Company

Registration, activity, owners, beneficial owners, management, litigation and reputational circumstances

Company Due Diligence
05

Origin of funds

Professional, corporate and property basis of the declared capital.

06

Documents

Consistency of the details, the information contained and independent sources.

04 / VERIFICATION STANDARD

Every material conclusion must withstand verification by source

Возможные статусы
  • Confirmed
  • Partially confirmed
  • Discrepancy identified
  • Document required
  • Material risk
  • Cannot be verified

The absence of negative information is not equivalent to the absence of risk.

05 / СОСТАВ ПРОВЕРКИ

Двенадцать разделов, из которых собирается риск-профиль

Identity and documents

Confirmation that all information relates to a single person, and internal consistency of the documents provided.

Типы источников
  • documents provided
  • public registries
  • public identifiers
Возможный результат

Identity is confirmed or indicators requiring clarification are noted.

Limitations

The official validity of a document is confirmed by an authorised source, not by analytical verification.

Working environment of the analytical team: document comparison and structural diagrams

Trust does not replace verification. Verification defines the limits of reasonable trust.

Verified identity · Ownership clarity · Source consistency · Decision support
07 / DUE DILIGENCE FILE

How individual pieces of information become a risk profile

DUE DILIGENCE FILE / SAMPLEA private investor and the group of companies owned by them
Stated
  • identity
  • professional activity
  • source of wealth
  • ownership structure
  • purpose of the relationship
Проверяется
  • documents
  • companies
  • corporate history
  • beneficial control
  • PEP and sanctions
  • litigation history
  • source of funds
  • adverse media
18material information confirmed
03require an additional document
02discrepancies referred for discussion
01factor requires extended verification

Example report structure. Not a description of any specific client.

08 / RESULT

Not merely a set of information found, but a basis for a specific decision

  • identification profile
  • document verification results
  • ownership and control structure
  • identified beneficial owners
  • PEP and sanctions result
  • corporate and litigation timeline
  • reputational context
  • source of funds analysis
  • map of material connections
  • list of discrepancies
  • final risk profile
  • list of additional documents required
  • the boundaries of the check
Структура отчета
  1. 01Executive SummaryMain conclusion and its basis
  2. 02Verified FactsConfirmed information with sources
  3. 03Material DiscrepanciesMaterial discrepancies
  4. 04Risk MapRisk profile by scope
  5. 05Open QuestionsQuestions requiring documents
  6. 06Source RegisterRegister of sources and dates
09 / КЛИЕНТЫ

Кому необходим Due Diligence

Financial institution trading floor

Banks and financial institutions

Onboarding a client with an international structure and capital whose origin requires explanation.

Проверяемые контуры
  • Identity
  • Documents
  • Sanctions & PEP
  • Source of Funds

Recommended formatEnhanced Due Diligence

10 / SCENARIOS

How verification changes a decision

DD-01Enhanced Due DiligenceA composite example based on typical tasks

Enhanced Due Diligence of a private investor

The task - to decide whether to enter into a relationship with a private investor. Initial information: questionnaire, documents, two countries, a declared source of wealth.

Проверенные контуры: Identity, Documents, Ownership, Sanctions & PEP, Source of Funds.

Подтверждено. Identity, corporate roles and part of the basis of wealth were confirmed.

Расхождение. Discrepancy: the scale of the declared capital was not fully explained by the established activity.

Результат для решения. The client received a list of documents needed to resolve the discrepancy and could decide on the terms of the relationship.

Banking information was not requested, and part of the period remained without documentary confirmation.

DD-02Beneficial OwnershipA composite example based on typical tasks

Establishing the ultimate beneficial owner of an international structure

The task - to understand who actually controls the counterparty. Initial information: a company in a jurisdiction with limited disclosure.

Scopes checked: Ownership, Companies, Courts, Reputation.

Подтверждено. Three links of the ownership chain and a match of representatives between the companies were confirmed.

Расхождение. Discrepancy: the declared sole owner did not match the indicators of actual control.

Результат для решения. The legal team received an ownership chart distinguishing confirmed links from presumed ones.

The ultimate beneficial owner in one jurisdiction was not established - disclosure is limited by law.

DD-03Source of FundsA composite example based on typical tasks

Identifying discrepancies in the source of funds

The task - to verify the declared source of funds before a major transaction. Initial information: a business sale agreement and the party's explanations.

Verified scope: Source of Funds, Companies, Courts, Documents.

Подтверждено. The sale of the company is confirmed by corporate sources.

Расхождение. Discrepancy: the amount and date of settlement did not correspond with the stated chronology.

Результат для решения. The decision was deferred pending settlement documents; the party provided the documents in part.

Confirmation of payments is possible only through client documents; banking data is not requested.

DD-04Counterparty CheckA composite example based on typical tasks

Verification of parties before entering into a major business relationship

The task is to verify both parties to a prospective long-term contract. Initial information: two companies, three jurisdictions.

Проверенные контуры: Identity, Companies, Ownership, Sanctions & PEP, Courts.

Подтверждено. Registration, management and the absence of direct sanctions matches were confirmed.

Расхождение. Discrepancy: one party was found to have outstanding court obligations not disclosed during negotiations.

Результат для решения. The terms of the contract were revised in light of the circumstances identified.

The assessment reflects the position as of the date of verification and requires updating before signing.

11 / PROCESS

The depth of a check is determined by the decision at stake, not by the length of a checklist

  1. 01

    Initial contact

    The client identifies the subject of the check and the decision to be made.

  2. 02

    Admissibility check

    We assess the lawfulness of the task, conflicts of interest and applicable requirements.

  3. 03

    Subject and purpose

    We determine what exactly is being checked and for what decision.

  4. 04

    Choice of depth

    We agree the level of verification: basic, extended or comprehensive.

  5. 05

    Sources and documents

    We define the set of sources and the list of documents required from the client.

  6. 06

    Collection and comparison

    We collect information and compare what is stated with what is confirmed.

  7. 07

    Verification of discrepancies

    Each material discrepancy is checked separately.

  8. 08

    Risk profile

    We produce the final risk profile and a list of open questions.

  9. 09

    Discussion of the outcome

    We review the conclusions, limitations and any further documents required.

12 / ФОРМАТ ПРОЕКТА

Three levels of verification

Выберите уровень по цене решения, числу объектов и юрисдикций.

01

Initial Due Diligence

From €2,500

Usually 4-7 business days

The final cost depends on the number of subjects, countries, depth of verification and availability of sources. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.

Basic verification of one person or company across core areas.

Included
  • one person or one company
  • basic identification
  • core corporate sources
  • PEP and sanctions indicators
  • basic adverse media
  • key litigation background
  • brief risk profile

Brief risk profile with sources and the limits of verification.

02Recommended format

Enhanced Due Diligence

€6,000 to €15,000

Usually 10-20 business days

The final cost depends on the number of subjects, countries, depth of verification and availability of sources. Third-party expenses are agreed in advance.

Extended verification of an individual and related companies in several countries with analysis of the origin of funds.

Included
  • individual and related companies
  • extended document verification
  • ownership structure
  • beneficial owners
  • several countries
  • PEP, sanctions and adverse media
  • Source of Funds
  • verification of discrepancies

Detailed report, ownership chart, risk map and list of discrepancies.

03Complex

Complex International Due Diligence

On request

Timeframe is determined after assessment

The fee is determined after assessment and depends on the number of subjects, jurisdictions and the complexity of the structure. Third-party costs are agreed in advance.

Comprehensive work covering several individuals and organizations, PEP context and Source of Wealth.

Included
  • several individuals and organizations
  • complex structures
  • several jurisdictions
  • PEP or elevated political risk
  • Source of Wealth
  • investment or conflict context
  • individual report structure
  • support during discussion of results

Individual report with risk map and support during discussion of results.

13 / LIMITATIONS

Depth of verification does not override legal limits

  • BLACKFILE does not obtain unlawful access to bank accounts
  • BLACKFILE does not use closed government systems
  • BLACKFILE does not obtain correspondence or device data
  • BLACKFILE does not represent analytical verification as official government control
  • BLACKFILE does not guarantee the absence of all possible risks
  • BLACKFILE does not replace a bank, lawyer, auditor or regulator

BLACKFILE verifies the information contained in the document, available indicators of inconsistency and consistency with independent sources. Official confirmation of validity depends on the availability of an authorized source or a specialized provider.

15 / СВЯЗАННЫЕ НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ

Что уточняют вместе с комплексным Due Diligence

14 / QUESTIONS

What is important to understand before the check begins

A Background Check answers the question of who a person is: biography, roles, obligations. Due Diligence is broader and is always tied to a specific decision: in addition to the person, it examines documents, companies, beneficial owners, the origin of funds and the circumstances of the transaction, and the result is presented as a risk profile for that decision. In simple terms, a Background Check is one scope of work within Due Diligence.

Yes, this is one of the main areas of work. We check identity and documents, biography and activity, companies and roles, PEP and sanctions indicators, litigation circumstances, reputational context and the origin of funds. The depth depends on the decision: onboarding a client, an appointment, a partnership or an investment each require a different scope.

We verify the information contained in the document: internal consistency of the details, available indicators of inconsistency and correspondence with independent sources and the questionnaire. Official confirmation of a document's validity is given by an authorized source or a specialized provider - we will not present an analytical check as a government one.

An advanced level applied when the cost of error is high or a basic check has raised questions. It covers related companies, ownership structure and beneficial owners, multiple countries, PEP and sanctions, adverse media, source of funds analysis and mandatory verification of any discrepancies found. The result is a detailed report with a risk map, not a certificate.

Yes, the check is run against official sanctions and restrictive lists, as well as the public office-holding status of the subject and related persons. An important nuance: a name match by itself means nothing - until identity is confirmed, it remains a technical match, and we state this directly.

Source of Funds is the origin of the specific funds involved in a transaction or relationship: the sale of an asset, income from an activity, dividends. Source of Wealth is the overall property and professional basis of a person's wealth as a whole. The first answers the question of where this money came from, the second - where this capital came from in general. For major decisions, both are usually required.

Yes, and this is often where the result lies: a structure that looks simple in one jurisdiction may have related companies in others. Each country has its own registers, scope of disclosure and cost of access, and the number of jurisdictions directly affects timing and price.

Through the ownership chain: from the company to its participants, from participants to their owners, down to natural persons. Where beneficial ownership registers are closed, indirect indicators are used - representatives, addresses, counterparties, history of roles. Such conclusions are labeled as analytical, not as established fact, and this distinction is maintained in the report.

A discrepancy is not a verdict. We verify it against a second independent source, determine what document or explanation could resolve it, and set it out in a separate section of the report with an assessment of materiality. Some discrepancies are explained by circumstances: a change in name spelling, differences in legislation, outdated register data.

For an initial assessment - none: it is enough to describe the subject, the countries and the decision at hand. Beyond that, the set of documents depends on the task: identification documents, corporate papers, contracts or proof of source of funds. Documents are requested only after the scope and a secure transmission channel have been agreed.

Initial - usually 4-7 business days, Enhanced - 10-20 business days. The comprehensive international format depends on the number of subjects and jurisdictions, and the timeline is determined after assessment. The countdown begins after the scope is agreed and the initial data is received, not from the moment of first contact.

Only the client and persons named by the client: compliance, legal team, board of directors. Materials are not passed to third parties, the subject of the check is not notified of it, and transmission takes place over an agreed secure channel.

When the cost of error is high, a formal check alone is not enough

Describe the subject and the forthcoming decision. BLACKFILE will assess the admissibility of the task, the required depth and a secure format of engagement.

16 / INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Describe the subject of the check and the decision to be made

At this stage, general information is sufficient. Documents are not uploaded before a secure channel is agreed.

Contact

An initial enquiry creates no obligations and does not mean the matter is automatically accepted.