Обновлено

01 / PRE-LITIGATION INTELLIGENCE · DISPUTE PREPARATION

A strong legal position begins with a verified picture of the facts

Before filing a claim or building a defence, it is important to understand not only the content of the documents but also the actual sequence of events, the structure of the parties involved, the movement of assets and the origin of key assertions.

BLACKFILE helps reconstruct the factual picture of a dispute, verify material circumstances and prepare structured material for the legal team.

Facts · Timeline · Parties · Assets · Evidentiary gaps

At this stage, a general description of the situation is sufficient. Procedurally sensitive documents are submitted only after a secure channel has been agreed.

02 / CASE READINESS BOARD

Case readiness matrix: what is confirmed, what conflicts and what is missing

The board shows how preparation is structured: each key question in the matter receives an established fact, a source, contradictions, gaps and a next action. All interface data is fictitious.

  • Established fact
    The decision was signed by the director of a subsidiary structure.
    Source
    Corporate register, minutes, articles of association.
    Supporting material
    Extract, copy of minutes, current version of the articles.
    Contradiction
    The articles require board approval; no evidence of approval was found.
    Missing information
    Board minutes for the disputed period.
    Relevance for the legal team
    Calls into question the validity of the decision.
    Next action
    Request the minutes through legal procedure.

Red indicates a material contradiction, a critical gap, an approaching deadline or assets requiring urgent attention. All interface data is fictitious.

03 / SITUATIONS

Before proceeding, it is necessary to understand what can actually be confirmed

  1. 01

    Corporate conflict

    Dispute between shareholders, partners, executives or beneficial owners of a company.

  2. 02

    Breach of contract

    Verification of the sequence of negotiations, performance of obligations, payments and the parties' actual conduct.

  3. 03

    Asset diversion or concealment

    Examination of corporate changes, movement of funds, transfer of property and related structures.

  4. 04

    International dispute

    Verification of parties, companies, assets and facts across multiple jurisdictions.

  5. 05

    Fraud and misrepresentation

    Reconstruction of events, statements, documents and connections existing before and after the disputed act.

  6. 06

    Preparing a defense

    Independent verification of the other party's allegations, sources of information and factual contradictions.

04 / WHAT IS EXAMINED

Individual pieces of information are combined into a single model of the matter

  1. 01

    Participants

    Individuals and legal entities, executives, owners, intermediaries and related structures.

  2. 02

    Corporate connections

    Ownership, management, affiliation, changes in structure and possible conflicts of interest.

  3. 03

    Chronology

    Events, documents, negotiations, payments, corporate actions and changes in the parties' positions.

  4. 04

    Assets

    Companies, real estate, financial interests, digital assets and other identifiable objects.

  5. 05

    Financial indicators

    Payments, obligations, indications of fund diversion, related companies and inconsistencies with available data.

  6. 06

    Documents and statements

    Origin, sequence, contradictions, external corroboration and connection to established events.

  7. 07

    Sources of evidence

    Public registries, corporate documents, court materials, financial information, digital traces and information lawfully provided by the client.

05 / THE ARCHITECTURE OF A MATTER

Every statement follows the same path

  1. Fact

    What happened and what can be confirmed.

  2. Source

    What the statement is based on.

  3. Check

    Whether the information is confirmed by independent data.

  4. Connection

    How the fact relates to other parties and events.

  5. Gap

    What information is missing for a complete picture.

  6. Action

    What the legal team may consider as the next step.

BLACKFILE establishes and structures the facts. Legal characterization, strategy and procedural decisions are determined by the client's legal team.

FACTS / POSITION

A position in a dispute is worth exactly as much as the facts it relies on.

06 / RESULT

Material the legal team can work with immediately

  • R-01a map of the parties and related structures
  • R-02a timeline of key events
  • R-03table of confirmed facts
  • R-04list of contradictions
  • R-05asset map
  • R-06corporate structures
  • R-07financial analytical memorandum
  • R-08register of sources
  • R-09evidence gap map
  • R-10list of questions for further investigation
  • R-11appendices with supporting materials
  • R-12closed analytical briefing
ВИЗУАЛЬНЫЙ КОМПЛЕКТ
  1. 01Executive Brief
  2. 02Timeline
  3. 03Parties & Connections Map
  4. 04Asset Map
  5. 05Evidence Gap Matrix
  6. 06Source Appendix
07 / SCENARIOS

How preparation changes the starting position

Composite examples based on typical matters. Details have been altered to preserve confidentiality.

PL-01

Dispute between shareholders

Before filing the claim it was necessary to establish the sequence of corporate decisions and verify the connections between participants of several companies.

Result
  • chronology of changes reconstructed
  • ownership and management structure built
  • contradictions identified between statements and registration data
  • material prepared for legal assessment
PL-02

Transfer of assets before the dispute arose

The client had partial information on the transfer of assets to related structures.

Result
  • corporate changes established
  • related companies and individuals identified
  • timeline of events built
  • directions identified for further official requests
PL-03

Verification of contractual chronology

In an international dispute, the parties' positions depended on the sequence of negotiations, payments and actual performance of obligations.

Result
  • documents and external sources combined
  • sequence of events reconstructed
  • inconsistencies noted
  • matrix of facts and evidence gaps prepared
PL-04

Preparing a defense

It was necessary to independently verify the material statements made by the other party.

Result
  • the source of each key statement established
  • part of the information received independent confirmation
  • unconfirmed conclusions and internal contradictions identified
  • analytical basis prepared for counsel's work
08 / PROCESS

From initial assessment to closed briefing

  1. 01

    Initial assessment

    We obtain a general description of the situation, the parties, jurisdiction, stage of the dispute and upcoming deadlines.

  2. 02

    Framing the questions

    Together with the client or legal team, we identify the factual questions that require answers.

  3. 03

    Matter map

    We build an initial structure of participants, events, companies, assets and information gaps.

  4. 04

    Investigation and verification

    We gather available information, cross-check sources and verify key conclusions.

  5. 05

    Assembling the analytical material

    We prepare a chronology, connection maps, a matrix of facts, appendices and an executive summary.

  6. 06

    Closed briefing

    We deliver the material and discuss the facts identified, the limitations of the research and possible directions for further work.

09 / ENGAGEMENT FORMATS AND FEES

From an initial matter assessment to a multi-party international dispute

01

Case Assessment

from €4,000

Timeframe: 5-8 business days

For an initial independent assessment of the situation and the available evidentiary base.

Includes
  • initial analysis of the task
  • up to five key participants
  • one principal jurisdiction
  • verification of available corporate and court sources
  • preliminary chronology
  • map of information gaps
  • brief analytical conclusion

A brief analytical conclusion with a preliminary chronology and a map of gaps.

02Most requested

Pre-Litigation Intelligence

10 000-30 000 €

Timeframe: 15-30 business days

For comprehensive preparation of the factual basis of a legal dispute.

Includes
  • extended verification of participants
  • corporate and financial analytics
  • reconstruction of events
  • map of connections and assets
  • verification of documents and statements
  • Evidence Gap Matrix
  • register of sources
  • detailed analytical report

A detailed analytical report with connection maps, a gap matrix and a closed briefing.

03International disputes

Complex Dispute Intelligence

After assessment

Timeframe determined after assessment of the task

For international, multi-party and especially complex disputes.

Possible composition
  • dedicated project team
  • several jurisdictions
  • multiple companies and participants
  • in-depth asset search
  • analysis of digital and financial traces
  • staged delivery of results
  • regular updates
  • work in coordination with several legal teams

An individual research programme with staged delivery of results.

The final cost depends on the number of participants, jurisdictions, documents, the period under review, urgency and the depth of verification required. The scope and stages are agreed before work begins.

10 / LEGAL AND PROFESSIONAL LIMITS

Factual analysis - within the law and professional independence

BLACKFILE is not a law firm and does not replace a lawyer. We establish, verify and structure facts. Legal qualification, admissibility of evidence and procedural strategy are determined by the legal team and the competent court.

BLACKFILE не осуществляет
  • unlawful acquisition of documents
  • hacking of accounts and devices
  • interference with private life
  • pressure on witnesses and parties to the dispute
  • fabrication of evidence
  • concealment or alteration of materials
  • unlawful surveillance
  • contact with the represented party without coordination with the legal team
  • presenting analytical conclusions as facts established by a court
12 / QUESTIONS

What is important to understand before starting preparation

The sooner the key questions and sources are defined, the more time remains to verify information before procedural deadlines.

Yes. The engagement format can be agreed with the legal team so that the materials correspond to its factual tasks and the structure of the case.

Materials can be prepared for the legal team, however their admissibility and the manner of procedural use are determined by the lawyer and the court.

No. BLACKFILE provides a factual and analytical basis. Legal conclusions are made by the client's legal counsel.

Yes, if the task is lawful and based on admissible sources and methods. The feasibility and depth of verification are assessed before work begins.

The investigation can be divided into stages: initial assessment, identification of key events, prioritization of documents and expanded verification of material episodes.

Yes. The composition of the team and the methods used are determined taking into account jurisdictions, languages, availability of sources and the nature of the dispute.

Yes. We can carry out an initial assessment of the factual side of the task. For legal strategy and procedural actions the client will need legal counsel.

13 / INITIAL ASSESSMENT

We will check how ready the factual basis is for a dispute

At the initial stage, describe the situation in general terms. Do not send procedurally sensitive documents, personal data or confidential materials until a secure channel has been agreed.

Contact

Procedurally sensitive materials are transmitted only after a secure channel has been agreed.

Verify the factual basis before the other party does

Describe the situation, jurisdiction and nearest deadline. BLACKFILE will assess the matter's readiness and propose a preparation format.