Обновлено

01 / PRE-INVESTMENT INTELLIGENCE

The investment hypothesis must withstand a check against the facts

BLACKFILE reviews founders, beneficial owners, project history, corporate structure, key contracts and external premises before an investor takes on an irreversible commitment.

We show which parts of the investment thesis are confirmed, which depend on a single party, and which require a condition, further diligence or walking away from the deal.

View the Investment Thesis Map

Founders · Ownership · Market Claims · Contracts · Deal Risk

02 / ОСНОВНАЯ МЫСЛЬ

A pitch deck explains the opportunity. A check must explain the dependency

A project may look convincing but depend on a single founder, an unconfirmed contract, a related supplier, a permit, disputed IP or capital whose origin is undisclosed. Investment Intelligence turns the project's claims into verifiable statements and decision conditions.

  1. 01

    who controls the project

  2. 02

    what already exists and what is only planned

  3. 03

    which statements are independently confirmed

  4. 04

    which counterparties and permits the model depends on

  5. 05

    what should be included in the deal conditions

03 / СИТУАЦИИ

When a check is needed

Pre-seed / Seed

Check the team, IP, legal structure and early demand confirmations.

04 / INVESTMENT THESIS STRESS MAP

Each key premise receives evidence, a dependency and a decision condition

Statement in the project materials
The founders state successful experience in two prior projects in the industry
Independent confirmation
Roles and periods are confirmed by registers and independent publications
Source and date
Corporate registers and archival sources; as of the report date
Critical dependency
Key competencies are concentrated in two individuals
Possible transaction condition
Retention and continuity plans for key participants
Question for a specialist
Legal: vesting terms and founder obligations

No overall score is produced without a transparent methodology. Only one material gap in the investment hypothesis is flagged in red.

05 / ОБЪЕКТЫ ПРОВЕРКИ

What is checked

  1. 01
    Founders and key team

    biography, past projects, roles, conflicts and public factors

  2. 02
    Beneficial owners and corporate structure

    shareholdings, rights, related parties and changes

  3. 03
    Capital history

    investors, stated sources, convertible instruments and obligations within the available data

  4. 04
    Product and IP

    stated ownership, licenses, dependencies and questions for technical/legal review

  5. 05
    Market and commercial claims

    independent verifiability of clients, partnerships, permits and metrics

  6. 06
    Financial premises

    model logic, concentration, related parties and anomalies; not an audit

  7. 07
    Jurisdictions and regulation

    applicable limitations, sanctions, licensing and country risk

  8. 08
    Deal structure

    investor rights, terms, milestones and exit points as questions for lawyers

CLAIMS / EVIDENCE / CONDITIONS

Материал проекта не принимается за независимое подтверждение.

06 / РЕЗУЛЬТАТ

Not a "buy" recommendation, but a verifiable basis for a decision

INVESTMENT MEMO / SAMPLE

Состав материала

  • executive investment brief
  • profile of founders and key participants
  • map of beneficial owners and control rights
  • Investment Thesis Stress Map
  • list of confirmed and unconfirmed claims
  • corporate, sanctions and reputational factors
  • key project dependencies
  • list of questions for legal, finance, tax and technical review
  • possible deal terms and milestones
  • scenarios in which the thesis requires revision
  • log of sources and limitations
01Proceed to specialist review

the thesis is confirmed: the next step is specialist advisors

02Proceed with conditions

the deal is viable once terms and milestones are closed out

03Pause and verify

material gap: proceed only after verification

No automatic recommendation is produced without client involvement.

07 / АУДИТОРИИ

Who this check is built for

Private investors

Question

What in the project is independently confirmed, and what remains the founders' word?

Result

Verified facts, dependencies and conditions before money changes hands.

08 / СОСТАВНЫЕ ПРИМЕРЫ

How verification changes the deal terms

The examples are composite and do not describe a specific client.

II-01Composite example

Unconfirmed partnership

The startup cited a strategic partnership as the basis for growth. Independent sources confirmed only a pilot of limited duration with no obligation to scale.

ResultThe investment hypothesis was recalculated, and confirmation of the contract was included in the terms of the next stage.

II-02Composite example

Dependence on the founder

The technology, client relationships and key permits were in fact concentrated with a single founder, although the project's structure appeared distributed.

ResultThe dependency map shaped questions on IP, authority and the continuity plan prior to signing the documents.

COMPOSITE SCENARIO

Illustrative image. The scenario is composite.

09 / ПРОЦЕСС

From the investment thesis to the decision memo

  1. Why the project is being considered and what must be true.

10 / ФОРМАТ ПРОЕКТА

Engagement formats

01

Basic Investment Check

4 000 €

typically 48-72 hours

Rapid check of founders, shell structure and the project's key statements.

Included
  • founders and key team
  • basic ownership structure
  • jurisdiction and public risks
  • initial verification of key statements
  • list of questions before the next stage

Early stop factors and the decision on the depth of the next stage.

02Recommended format

Advanced Investment Intelligence

6 000-15 000 €

usually 5-10 business days

Full verification of the thesis with a dependency map and deal terms.

Included
  • verification of the team and related projects
  • beneficial owners and control
  • Investment Thesis Stress Map
  • verification of commercial claims
  • corporate, financial and regulatory factors
  • scenarios and deal terms for discussion with advisers

A verifiable basis for the decision and terms for deal documents.

03

Complex Investment Review

individual estimate

staged decision gates and executive briefing

Coordination of the verification of a complex investment with a team of advisers.

Included
  • large or multi-party investment
  • several countries and companies
  • complex capital structure
  • coordination with legal/financial/technical advisers
  • staged decision gates and executive briefing

Managed verification with decision checkpoints.

The cost depends on the stage, number of participants, countries and statements to be verified. BLACKFILE does not guarantee returns and does not provide personal investment advice.

11 / ГРАНИЦЫ

Independent verification strengthens a decision but does not make it for the investor

BLACKFILE verifies facts and dependencies within the limits of available data. We do not conduct an audit without the corresponding authority, do not assess technology in place of a specialised expert, do not give a tax or legal opinion, and do not predict the success of a project with a guarantee.

  • conflict of interest is checked before work begins
  • project materials are not accepted as independent confirmation
  • fact, assessment and scenario are kept separate
  • a gap is formulated as a question, not an accusation
  • the decision remains with the investor and its advisers
12 / RELATED AREAS OF WORK
13 / ВОПРОСЫ

Questions before starting

Investment Intelligence examines the investment thesis, team, dependencies and structure of a specific decision. Company Due Diligence examines an operating company more broadly.

We analyse its logic, external assumptions and inconsistencies. A full financial review or audit is performed by a specialised professional.

Yes, but the conclusions will be limited to the confirmations available. Particular attention shifts to the team, IP, structure, pilots and dependencies.

No. BLACKFILE provides verifiable facts, risks, gaps and scenarios for the investor's decision.

Yes, provided the task is lawful and sufficient identifiers and sources are available.

The team composition, access to materials and transmission channel are agreed once the task has been reviewed. No documents are requested at the initial stage.

14 / INITIAL ASSESSMENT

Describe the project without submitting the pitch deck or documents

At the first stage, it is sufficient to indicate the stage, sector, countries, the intended participation size as a range, and the key concern.

Contact

At the first stage, it is sufficient to indicate the stage, sector, countries, the intended participation size as a range, and the key concern.